On 17 March 2015 at 13:45, Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> wrote: > >Ah yes, IMAP raises its head again. I wouldn't trust me to code > >anything in nmh. But, I can test things and report results, > >should this ever get off the ground. > > Well, I once suggested we should either write a backend for Offline IMAP, > or implement it on our own. See it here: > > http://offlineimap.org
Interesting. Looks active, as I see commits today. So, is the basic idea to have the user interface to nmh operate via all the same nmh commands and present a folder view to the user.? But, the message storage would move into an IMAP form, possibly manipulated by OfflineIMAP? If so, it sounds like nmh could need a lot of refactoring to funnel the nmh <--> IMAP interchanges through the smallest reasonable number of functions. A companion set of functions could be maintained to continue with the MH storage format. Thanks for the reference.... -- Kevin _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
