On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 07:49:58 +0700, Robert Elz said: > Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:49:25 -0400 > From: Valdis Kletnieks <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > > | Which of course in any standard-compliant MUA will almost certainly do > | one of the first two and never bother looking at the third one. > > Without knowing what the parts contain, I can't say whether the format is > appropriate or not, but your interpretation of what should happen is > incorrect - a standards compliant MUA that understands text/calendar should > process that part (the last understood alternative is the one that is > supposed to be preferred)
Gaah. Pass me the caffeine, will ya? :) I got led down the primrose path of thinking it was the *first* understood one because I've seen far too many meeting invites that had crucial info buried in the text/html that would be ignored if only the text/calendar was processed.... ... though now I am starting to understand why I've been in so many meetings where it seems like only the organizer and myself had read the memo :)
pgpS471mTCon3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
