Hi, Should nmh try to get out in front with email address internationalzation (EAI)? See resources below.
>From the MUA perspective, IIUC, it relies on native support on the host to handle unencoded UTF-8 addresses. Would nmh support just be a matter of 1) not encoding addresses (controlled by a switch) in outgoing messages and 2) when showing a message, indicating that an address couldn't be displayed? Does anyone have experience using it? Gmail supports it, according to the article below. Thanks, David Resources: Arnt Gulbrandsen and Jiankang Yao, "Email Address Internationalization", Computing Edge, June 2015, p. 50. http://www.computer.org/cms/computing-edge/ce-jun15-final.pdf https://tools.ietf.org/wg/eai/ EAI status pages RFC 6530 Overview and Framework for Internationalized Email RFC 6532 Internationalized Email Headers RFC 6857 Post-Delivery Message Downgrading for Internationalized Email Messages RFC 6858 Simplified POP and IMAP Downgrading for Internationalized Email _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
