>post(1) -snoop currently doesn't decode base64-encoded smtp >authentication information. I'm thinking of decoding it to make it >easier to use, and to not mask it.
I personally have no objections ... but my only caution is that sometimes the base64 encoded SASL tokens are actually binary, so you should make sure you use a pretty-printer that can handle binary. Also, to me the point behind -snoop is to observer the actual SMTP/POP network transmission; decoding the base64 means that you won't see that. So I don't know if it's worth marking it somehow that it's base64, or maybe make it so can not decode the SASL tokens. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
