>> Thoughts? I realize this is a significant behavior change > >+1. The `Forward' header is grabbing another one for nmh's use, in >addition to the existing `Attach'. Should we be using `Nmh-Forward' if >the user isn't likely to have the hassle of typing them most of the >time?
Sigh. I think when we hashed this out last time, the (rough) consensus was that not puttting in a "Nmh-" prefix was fine. Attach had prior art (I think mutt used it), and Forward seems to be similarly named. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
