>That kind of dependency should be removed. Is there any reason not to >add a new component if one (fcc, in this case) isn't found?
Since it's been around forever, I'm not sure we can easily change it without breaking a lot of existing format files. I think the original MH authors didn't intend that fcc be copied from a replied-to message; seems like it would be simple to make sure it's cleared out if a -fcc switch isn't supplied (we've already documented that we "own" it in repl(1)). I think we'd need to do that even if we used another component name. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
