Hi, > > I can see why the `(5)' is dropped on the second reference, so soon > > after the first, but why does it become bold instead of italic?
For completeness, Larry replied, accidentally off list, to say that was just a simple mistake. And I agree with kre's comment on the `contains' v. `is'. -- Cheers, Ralph. https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
