>It may or may not matter that I use exmh not direct nmh commands. >exmh seems to cache the scan output, but then again it adds a lot of >its own overhead.
AFAIK, exmh does NOT use any native nmh commands for message display or sequence manipulation. Yes, it does cache scan output, but I believe it opens the message file directly based on what's in the scan output. So it's probably the best case there. Might be interesting to see how long "show last > /dev/null" takes for a larger folder. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
