In a message of Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:04:11 +0200, Johan Viklund writes: >Ken Hornstein (>): >>I'll be looking at this ... but it looks like to me the encoding isn't >>necessary for this user, because no characters are actually encoded in >>that name? > >Well that's not a name I have in my alias file anyway, I was just trying to >figure out whether it had anything to do with decoding non ascii characters or >not. > > >>Johan didn't say what his operating systems was, but I had guessed a Linux >>system. > >Sorry about that, it's OS X. > > >>It occurs to me that a group cannot start with '?', so a simple solution >>would be to just treat '=?' as the start of literal text; that would take >>care of any RFC-2047 encoded addresses. > >I would be very happy for this. Besides, does anybody use this unix-group >feature as it's supposed to be used? > >-- >Johan Viklund
I have piles of Swedish names that would benefit, though mine would all be encoded UTF-8 Laura _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
