Ralph wrote: > 80a9e99f7078199500d2d53c8d77d1b92af06fbc added an assert(3) as part of > the -width-overflow fix for Valdis's email.
Right. If w < 0, bad things happen in the code just following. If w can indeed be negative there, maybe that code block should be simply skipped. > any problems, in C or en_GB.utf8 locale, but it seems quite possible to > me that the wcwidth() of a `mbtowc() < 0' could be -1, as above? wcwidth() should be negative only if wide_char is non-printable. The code checks if iswcntrl() or iswspace(), and if so, skips the assert and output. If it is a wide control character, then it's not printable, right? David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
