Hi Valdis, > > Here are man pages sourced by other "one line" man pages. ... > > man5/mh-profile.5 ← man/mh_profile.man > > man5/mh-tailor.5 ← man/mts.conf.man > > > > The files they document are $HOME/.mh_profile and /etc/nmh/mts.conf. > > I don't think mh-profile(5) and mh-tailor(5) should exist or be > > referred to; it's just confusion and clutter. > > Keep mh-profile. It's useful to have all (or almost so) things > possible in a config file documented in one place. Also, where exactly > are you planning to exile all the "standard profile entries" to?
I was suggesting ditching mh-profile(5) because the identical content is in mh_profile(5) and the latter better matches the name of the configuration file. Sorry if that wasn't clear. I guess going forward a non-m_getfld(), non-RFC-822-header, ~/.nmh* with a more sane syntax might appear, taking priority over the old-school configuration, so that would be another opportunity to rationalise the overlap. > (Though this *still* leaves the question of whether the Signature: > block needs proper quoting if it contains non-ascii or rfc-problematic > punctuation.... A brief experiment suggests it's used unaltered in %(myname) and (localmbox), following mh-format(5). How it's then handled depending where they're used... -- Cheers, Ralph. https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
