Hi Ken, > > How about giving inc(1) a [-sequence foo]... that added the > > incorporated emails to the sequences. The user's script could then > > cook up a unique sequence name, run inc, then pick(1) and mark(1) > > their way through that sequence doing what they liked. > > I like it; keeps the toolbox approach, simple to code, and flexible. > Were you thinking that the use of -sequence would negate also putting > those messages on the unseen sequence? Any other thoughts?
I hadn't considered it. I don't use unseen-sequence, but I think it would make sense that an explicit `-sequence foo' stopped the implicit unseen-sequence update. As for inc being silent, «inc -forma ''» almost achieves that apart from the annoying, noisy, non-Unix, "Incorporating new mail into inbox...\n\n". -- Cheers, Ralph. https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
