Ralph wrote:

> There are probably various valid paths where a program exit(0)s that
> don't write the context file.

Yeah, yet another unification target.

> sbr/done.c's done is a file pointer that often points to exit(3).
> Is it just a poor man's atexit(3),
> and should we aim to switch to that as it would give chaining?

And another, though I'm not sure what you have in mind.  atexit() has
started to creep in to nmh already.

David

_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

Reply via email to