Hello Ken, Ken Hornstein writes: > [...] > I am feeling reasonably confident about the quality of nmh 1.7 release > candidate 3. To that end, I sure would appreciate it if you had not had > a chance yet to test any nmh 1.7 release candidates, that you give RC3 a > try. If there are no issues with RC3 I hope to go to 1.7 final within > a week or two; widespread testing would greatly assist this process. So > if you have a moment or two to spare, give RC3 a try and let us know how > it works for you. If you've already done that, then thank you! > [...]
That's a great news! Back on how it works... I can confirm that the several bugs that affected early 1.7 RCs and I was able to reproduce are fixed on 1.7RC3. I have also run the tests on NetBSD/amd64 8.99.1 against 1.7RC3 and...: [...] ==================== All 110 tests passed (1 test was not run) ==================== [...] (the 1 test not run was the one that required valgrind, so it was expected and not a regression). Thank you and all nmh developers and community that made that possible! Keep up the good work! _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
