>Yes. Have you pointed out to them that even without producing invalid >base64, the RFC-breaking long lines raise its probability of being spam >in SpamAssassin's eyes? (Other spam detectors are available.)
I think at the level I'm at, such concerns would simply be discounted (or not understood). >If the "supportwall" is still proving impenetrable then it might be >worth going over the top. Sigh. I'll see if that is useful. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
