On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 20:32:44 -0400 Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> wrote: Ken Hornstein writes: > Since you say that it "often" > takes much less than a second, I am wondering if maybe that only happens > when new mail arrives and Dovecot needs to rescan the directory.
I have no idea. I need to look into it. Right now when I tried, it took 3ms. > >The trickier aspect, and the real issue for me, is proper > >synchronization when email is accessed from multiple machines, and which > >may not be connected all the time. On reconnection a client has to > >upload its changes and resync its local cache with the imap server so > >that changes made elsewhere are properly reflected. > > Well, that's why I was advocating a solution, which I guess I would > call "almost no caching". As I want to be able to use unix + mh commands I am interested in full caching. Without it I may as well stick to visual MUAs. > >So my current strategy is to wrap unchanged MH commands or rewrite the > >simpler ones which are more the "plumbing" kind, for example, mhpath and > >mhparam. > > Well, I do look forward to seeing what you implement! Please keep us > in the loop. Plan to. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
