ralph wrote:
> This suggests foo_{add,del,find,save,tweak}.c should in time become
> foo.c, allowing globals to become statics in foo.c, and currently global
> structs, etc., to also move to foo.c. Is there a good way of doing
> this, in multiple stages if necessary, that allows git to preserve the
> chain of history? Say telling it foo_add.c is now foo.c in one commit,
> and then foo_del.c has merged with foo.c in the next.
>
i'd be tempted to just "do it", and comment
it well in the commit message.
=----------------------
paul fox, [email protected] (arlington, ma, where it's 23.5 degrees)
--
Nmh-workers
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
