Ken wrote: > If it's not necessary anymore, I'd say remove it (and even if > it is necessary on FreeBSD 9, I would like to understand why and still > consider removing it).
I'll remove it now. > So I think > we should simply have the defaults be stock Autoconf directories, and > let users who want to segment nmh files off into their own directories > do that on their own with standard Autoconf build flags. +1 BTW, Ralph, the MACHINES file addresses all the points you raised in your message, I think. Including dependencies on Cygwin. Though looking at it now, we should probably move FreeBSD 9, OpenBSD, and Solaris 11 to the was-known-in-the-distant-past-to-compile category. David -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
