>> But .... from what you said, openssh does NOT hardcode the 'ssh' append in >> their configure.ac/Makefile.* for sysconfdir, it's just their _package_ >> (e.g., the RPM spec file) that does it, right? That seems to be following >> the GNU recommendations. > >Does it?
Weeell, I was talking about sysconfdir. I'm fine with us hardcoding a "nmh" extension for libexecdir, since that's inline with the GNU recommendations. >> I'm trying to see what the problem is with that. > >Re-litigation of Lyndon's decision, and Ralph's points that support it. We can't re-litigate decisions? Since when? We have certainly done that before. And like I said previously, back when the original decision was made I don't think anyone knew that it couldn't have been overridden; I certainly wasn't under that impression. Like I said, I only have a beef with sysconfdir; I'm fine with a hardcoded appending for libexecdir. --Ken -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
