> o [2001:db8::1]:80 > ... > The [] style as expressed in [RFC3986] SHOULD be employed, and is > the default unless otherwise specified. > >So I think we should only allow that format when provision is added; >it's enough, and is the only one I've seen in the wild.
Like I also said in that email, it's all doable; it's just more rototilling of internals than I personally want to do right now. Please don't let that stop anyone ELSE from doing the work. --Ken -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
