ken wrote: > >prompter is what i was thinking of. repl and forw also used it. it was ... > Yeah, I tried it quickly and it seems simple enough. And people who have > editor in their profile or use EDITOR/VISUAL won't notice a change. ... > >i think it should still be prompter, so that we have no editor > >assumption or dependency.
i'm good with prompter. i didn't know it existed, and wrote my own script to do much the same thing a couple of years ago, for use on my phone. bringing up vi on a phone's ssh connection is... sub-optimal. i don't think any of us involved in the vi-as-default thread from a few years back really considered that it might cause a package dependency. paul =---------------------- paul fox, [email protected] (arlington, ma, where it's 20.7 degrees) -- nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
