Hi Ken, Happy New Year! :-)
> And thinking about it ... I don't think the normal usage of dist(1) > SHOULD cause any problems. With regards to SPF, since it uses the > MAIL FROM header that should be fine, since your MAIL FROM should be > set properly to the identity of the dist(1)er. Since you aren't > modifying any headers when using dist(1), the DKIM signature should > still be valid. I think you're right on both counts, and that's what I used to think too. I know SPF, a bit about DKIM, and still less about DMARC, but I think DMARC complains because although SPF and DKIM are individually happy the headers are not in `alignment': DKIM's are still upstream compared to SPF. Failure can result. -- Cheers, Ralph. -- nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
