On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 09:57:49 -0500, Ken Hornstein writes: >And it strikes me as a bad idea to have Bcc behave >differently depending on the MTS you are using. So I think when >stripping Bcc out of the original draft and putting it IN the Bcc draft >makes the most sense.
very good, we're thinking along the same lines here. >Well ... where should this be documented better? what i meant was that the send manpage for example just says 'if you have dcc and anything but sendmail/pipe then...' but doesn't say what happens when you're on pipe. it's similar regarding that bcc is meant to produce those warning encrustations; not having used non-silent bcc in decades i couldn't figure that out fully from the manpages, but had to look at the source. >Really, if you have some suggestions I would >be glad to make them; I don't want to shove this on you, especially if >you are contributing a bug fix. no problem, i'll try to update the send and post manpages where applicable. >I firmly believe that post should reject the message immediately and nothing >should be sent. thanks for your advice; i'll work towards these in the next few days and will let you know when i have something workable. regards az -- Alexander Zangerl + GPG Key 2FCCF66BB963BD5F + http://snafu.priv.at/ Windows95 is a 32-bit extension to a 16-bit shell of an 8-bit OS originally written for a 4-bit microprocessor by a 2-bit company that can't stand 1-bit of competition.
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
-- nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
