>I understand that the list is broken (and I've passed this on to the >administrator). But my perspective is this: I've used nmh for eight >years, and while I'm a big fan of the concept, and it has noticeably >improved in usability in that time, it is still difficult. My camel's >back is not broken yet, but it's beginning to buckle under the strain. >I wish nmh would at least try to handle situations that other clients >handle. Being told "that OTHER software is broken" repeatedly might be >technically correct, but it doesn't help me when every mainstream mail >client seems to be at least minimally usable in these situations.
Dude, I feel your pain. I hope I communicated in my other email that I think we should do better. From a practical standpoint ... I try to balance my desire to re-architecture the MIME code completely (which would improve lots of things but take a long time) to fixing things in the short term (which helps people now, but is just adding a Band-Aid on top of a huge pile of Band-Aids). --Ken -- nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
