Ken wrote: > Can anyone think of a reason that for this specific > case closefds() should NOT be moved from whatnowbr.c (and send.c) into > sendsbr.c, and just in the child process?
That looks like a good change. The callers of sendsbr() shouldn't be concerned with its fork/exec. Those two closefds() have been there since early 1990, and maybe earlier. David -- nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
