>If I were to become extra-ambitious, and create a patch which added a >"-endofdigest" switch which did something similar, would there be >interest?
Yes ... but I would personally prefer if it was more generic. Like if the -endofdigest switch took a regular expression, because as far as I can tell there is no standard when it comes to digest format nowadays (sigh). --Ken -- nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
