Hi Ken, > I guess the core issue is that for Google servers when using TLS 1.2 > SNI isn't required, but for TLS 1.3 it is; well, let me rephrase that. > If you negotiate TLS 1.3 you get the bogus certificate if you don't > send a SNI. But it seems like the 'right' solution is we should be > sending a SNI to avoid this problem?
I agree nmh should employ SNI; I was just getting Michael up and running the simplest way possible. -- Cheers, Ralph. -- nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
