Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>> yes, but that's too specific. I'd like it generically for all lists :-)
> Sigh. I KNEW you were going to say that, but ... certainly you SOMEHOW
> managed to live without this feature UP UNTIL NOW. I have given you a
> solution that works for the upcoming changes to THIS mailing list. You
> can expand on it as you need. It's not perfect, but what is?
Yes, I've lived with lists that put [foobar] in them up to now.
It's almost more of a mh-e issue.
nmh-workers isn't the only list that will stop molesting the signed content.
(Not sure if :-) or :-( is appropriate here)
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
--
nmh-workers
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
