Valdis Klētnieks wrote in <235182.1574454918@turing-police>: |On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 20:51:52 +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso said: | |> I prefer people using Mail-Followup-To: instead of some ML |> software modifying the address lists, they could as well just |> avoid resending the mail!?! Yes, i mean, well. |> I really like looking into old archives and i hope what i see is |> the real original thing, which i think is a value by itself. |> But the world does not seem to cherish this. | |A bigger issue is GMail's handling of Message-Id: | |If you post to a mailing list, it notes the Message-Id: on the way out, |and when the list sends its copy to you, it gets silently munched by the |duplicate suppressor. So unless you are careful with Fcc: and have |nmh save a copy in the appropriate folder, your comments in a thread |go poof.
Poof also in use to spring out of existence. To me such situations happen regulary even without GMail ._. Before the upcoming release of my MUA i will have to add a reply-to-swapin variable so one can use the address in Reply-To: not only as an exclusive receiver override (as with M-F-T:), but only to replace the one address in From: (or Sender:) with it. This is the only idea i have to work with DKIM++ the way it is in use on those lists which use the "x via y" syntax. (Even if noone wants to hear just about any critics regarding DKIM / DMARC / ARC, neither here nor on other lists.) --End of <235182.1574454918@turing-police> --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)