>> # The password for POP service when the -sasl switch is used >> # with one of these programs is the login name on the local >> # machine. >> >> I've re-read that last paragraph ... and I realize that I do not >> understand it. > >The description or the semantics? It really did/does use the login >name for the password. I think it's long past time that we remove >that.
Is that ... correct? I am looking at the code and I cannot convince myself that statement is true. It is entirely possible that it USED to be that way but I don't think that is true for 1.7.1 (I mean, besides the bug in 1.7.1). --Ken
