>One of the things I think we lack of a message-ID -> message map. We >have discussed ways to store per-message meta-data outside of the >message file many times, and I don't think we ever came to a conclusion >here.
Weeellll ... I mean, we have the command-line INTERFACE for that, I think; pick(1) seems like the obvious answer. Sure, right NOW it trawls through every message in a folder, but there's no reason it couldn't look at some kind of metadata index. Paul Vixie wrote something like that a while ago. >so, it's gonna be okay to do: >now: > send -> my-back-post-replacement -> disk >later: > disk -> send -> post Yeah, that should be fine. --Ken
