Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> wrote: >> I rather wish that NMH would take a "Path" to be... >> well.. $PATH-like thing, such that I could move folders to an archive >> machine, with NMH being aware that they are elsewhere.
> You're allowed to give an absolute path as a folder name. E.g., you could
> do something like:
> % scan +/ssw/users/mcr/Mail/outgoing/y2001 last:50
Yes, I do that, for sure.
> Or whatever, and that will be the current folder. You can also push
> them on the folder stack. If you want them to show up when you do
> "folders", that's harder.
I don't know what the folder stack is.
I want them to show up when I do "folders --historical" or something like
that. I also imagine being able to send the compute commands involved to the
machine with the disks, and...
I had just assumed we'd all have our own storage robots by now.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
