>I originally looked at netsec_read() as an alternative, but thought it >would be easier (maybe not simpler) to use netsec_readline() since it >already had logic for dealing with CR/LF. And the more I looked at >using netsec_read(), the more it seemed like I would be reinventing >netsec_readline(). Perhaps this direction was misguided and I should >have stuck with netsec_read().
Sigh. Looking at it more closely ... there are no good answers. Really, to fix it PROPERLY, you need to change the API and rewrite stuff all the way back to inc.c. Which ... suck. --Ken
