Ken, > The bottom line is nmh (and MH before it) is just not going to perform > well with billion-sized gaps in message numbers and fixing that is going > to be very very hard.
understood. thanks for the explanation. cheers, Greg
Ken, > The bottom line is nmh (and MH before it) is just not going to perform > well with billion-sized gaps in message numbers and fixing that is going > to be very very hard.
understood. thanks for the explanation. cheers, Greg