Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> wrote: > However, it seems like Mike's problem is NOT that; the last two bytes of > his draft file are 00 a0. Cy's bug report said that can happen anywhere, > though.
!
> I know this change was to handle NUL bytes in outgoing messages, but I am
> wondering if maybe we should reject such drafts? Seems like any message
> actually sent with a NUL in it would be rather unfriendly. That might
> break things for people using MH-E, though, and as we've seen before that
> has a very long release cycle.
yeah, it's not so much that it does not get releases, as people do not
install them often.
This break, if it has a good/clear error would get fixed, I think.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
