Stephen wrote: > The question this patch raises for me is, > Where should the new function getcpy_len() go? > > I found it useful only in imaptest.c, so perhaps it should be > added there. > > But it is a variant of the existing getcpy() function, and it > seems useful enough that looking more might find more uses for > it, so perhaps it belongs in getcpy.c.
I just committed your original patch, which puts getcopy_len() in getcpy.[hc]. Thank you! David
