chaw wrote: > Following an earlier suggestion, I am attaching a patch that adds -empty > and (the default) -noempty switches to sortm.
Great! The patch itself is perfect. It just needs an update to the the sortm man page. Would you mind updating your patch with that? Thank you for your contribution, especially including the test case! As far as test-mhical goes, that test is a bit sensitive. If you have a chance to track down the issue, that would be great. Or at least post the message that it prints upon failure. David
