Paolo,

I too was disappointed when NONMEM VI appeared without the $OMEGA CORRELATION option. I agree with you that correlations are more intuitive and easier to use than covariances.

Unfortunately NONMEM VII beta continues with the same lack of support for a CORRELATION option.

AN ERROR WAS FOUND IN THE CONTROL STATEMENTS.

AN ERROR WAS FOUND ON LINE  12 AT THE APPROXIMATE POSITION NOTED:
$OMEGA BLOCK(3) CORRELATION
                          X
584  THIS FEATURE IS NOT PART OF NONMEM VII.

I wonder if someone from the NONMEM development team could explain why this feature remains unimplemented?

Nick

Paolo Denti wrote:
Dear all,
I was wondering if it is possible to insert the off-diagonal elements of OMEGA as correlations rather than covariances, because I find it more intuitive.

To my greatest happiness, I found the following information in a NONMEM chm help file:

___________________________________________________________________
|                                                                 |
|                                $OMEGA                           |
|_________________________________________________________________|

MEANING: Supplies initial estimates for the NONMEM OMEGA Matrix
CONTEXT: NM-TRAN Control Record

USAGE:
$OMEGA  [DIAGONAL(n)|BLOCK(n)|BLOCK(n) SAME|BLOCK SAME]                 5
        [[value1]  [value2]  [value3] ... [FIXED]]                      5
$OMEGA  [DIAGONAL(n)|BLOCK(n)|BLOCK(n,m)                                L
        [[value1]  [value2]  [value3]] ...                              L
        [VARIANCE|STANDARD]  [COVARIANCE|CORRELATON]                    L
        [FIXED]  [ALLOFFFIX]  [FIRSTFIXED]  [PRINCIPAL]]                L
        |BLOCK(n) SAME|BLOCK SAME]                                      L

SAMPLE:
$OMEGA BLOCK(3)  6. .005 .3 .0002 .006 .4

Reading on in the file, the [COVARIANCE|CORRELATON] sounded (in spite of the incorrect spelling) like the panacea I was looking for. Unfortunately, when I try to compile, I get a message saying that this option is not available in NONMEM VI. :-(
Is this sadly only a feature planned for future versions of NONMEM?
And if so, does anyone you know of other simple workarounds to use correlations instead of covariances?

Thank you in advance,
Paolo



--
Nick Holford, Professor Clinical Pharmacology
Dept Pharmacology & Clinical Pharmacology
University of Auckland, 85 Park Rd, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
[email protected] tel:+64(9)923-6730 fax:+64(9)373-7090
mobile: +33 64 271-6369 (Apr 6-Jul 20 2009)
http://www.fmhs.auckland.ac.nz/sms/pharmacology/holford


Reply via email to