Dear nmusers,

I have a question which I hope is not too trivial for the group. I am 
currently analyzing some data where I have more trust in values at late 
time points. Therefore, I would like WRES to be a function of time, 
putting more weight on late time points. In the help guide I found that 
WRES can be influenced by SPTWO, however no real documentation exists (or 
I am not aware of it) about how to use it. Does anybody have an example 
for me of how to code this? 
Moreover, I noticed that no matter how I describe my weighting for IWRES, 
this does not at all seem to influence my objective function or parameter 
values.  When evaluating a model, most people consider anyway that WRES is 
what counts, as IWRES are in most cases ok anyway. So my very simple 
question is: If this does not influence any of this and I don't use IWRES 
to decide if a model is good or bad, why bother at all to calculate them? 
I noticed that the standard errors seem to change depending on which 
weighting I use for IWRES. Can anybody explain this?

Thanks and best wishes
Nele
______________________________________________________________

Dr. Nele Käßner
Pharmacometrics -- Modeling and Simulation

Nycomed GmbH
Byk-Gulden-Str. 2
D-78467 Konstanz, Germany

Fon: (+49) 7531 / 84 -  4759
Fax: (+49) 7531 / 84 - 94759

mailto: [email protected]
http://www.nycomed.com

County Court: Freiburg, Commercial Register HRB 701257
Chairman Supervisory Board: Charles Depasse
Management Board: Dr. Barthold Piening, Gilbert Rademacher, Dr. Anders 
Ullman





----------------------------------------------------------------------
Proprietary or confidential information belonging to Nycomed Group may
be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated
in this message, please do not copy or deliver this message to anyone.
In such case, please destroy this message and notify the sender by
reply e-mail. Please advise the sender immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet e-mail for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that
pertain to the sender's employer and its products and services
represent the opinion of the sender and do not necessarily represent
or reflect the views and opinions of the employer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to