Koen,
What are the advantages of NONMEM7 with respect to older versions like
V and VI?
Automatic computation of eta and epsilon shrinkage.
The default objective function display format is easier for humans to
read (this can easily be implemented in NONMEM VI by changing the source
code).
Is it still "acceptable" to use versions V and VI nowadays?
I consider NONMEM V is obsolete and people still using it either are
using an unlicensed version or have terrible IT support.
NONMEM VI release 2 is the most reliable version. There are bugs in
NONMEM 7 that are not present in NONMEM VI (e.g. see recent email from
Paulo Denti).
In my experience NONMEM VI is generally faster and uses less memory than
NONMEM 7 which is a big advantage on multi-core machines. I can only run
3 problems with NONMEM 7at the same time but I can run 8 problems with
NONMEM VI on the same 8 core machine. The next version of NONMEM 7 is
expected to fix this memory problem but it remains to be seen if it faster.
Is there an "optimal" combination of NONMEM, compiler and operating
system?
The fastest compiler I know of is Intel Visual Fortran for both NONMEM
VI and NONMEM 7. There are occasionally differences in results between
compilers but I don't know of any systemic study that would favour one
compiler over another in terms of accuracy and consistency of results. I
am not aware that the OS makes any difference to the way that NONMEM
runs if the same compiler and hardware are used. Some virtual machine
hosts may be slow down runs e.g. I find that intensive disk activity
e.g. creating simulation table files with Windows 2003 running as a
virtual machine on top of Xen server is much slower than a native
Windows 2003 installation.
The main thing is to use the fastest CPU you can find!
Nick
On 23/10/2010 4:00 a.m., Jolling, Koen (Wavre) wrote:
Dear,
I would greatly appreciate your opinion on the following questions:
What are the advantages of NONMEM7 with respect to older versions like
V and VI?
Is it still "acceptable" to use versions V and VI nowadays?
Is there an "optimal" combination of NONMEM, compiler and operating
system?
Thanks,
Koen
Information in this email and any attachments is confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is
addressed or otherwise directed. Please note that any views or
opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of the Company. Finally, the recipient
should check this email and any attachments for the presence of
viruses. The Company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any
virus transmitted by this email. All SGS services are rendered in
accordance with the applicable SGS conditions of service available on
request and accessible at http://www.sgs.com/terms_and_conditions.htm
--
Nick Holford, Professor Clinical Pharmacology
Dept Pharmacology& Clinical Pharmacology
University of Auckland,85 Park Rd,Private Bag 92019,Auckland,New Zealand
tel:+64(9)923-6730 fax:+64(9)373-7090 mobile:+64(21)46 23 53
email: [email protected]
http://www.fmhs.auckland.ac.nz/sms/pharmacology/holford
