With Yoshi’s suggestion, you may try  FORM as a covariate (e.g. if
formulation is R, FORM=0 and T, FORM=1) and put it in the code as following

But I doubt all of theta 4,5,6,7 are necessary at this situation. If you
want to consider any change in PK parameters by periods, use of IOV in the
ETA terms may be better answer. 

 

Good Luck

Dong-Seok Yim

 

$PK
 KA=(THETA(1) + FORM*THETA(4))*EXP(ETA(1))
 CL=(THETA(2)+ FORM*THETA(5))*EXP(ETA(2))
 V=(THETA(3) + FORM*THETA(6))*EXP(ETA(3))

 F1=1 + FORM*THETA(7) 

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 3:19 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [NMusers] NONMEM codes about PK analysis from a cross-over
study design

 

Dear Xipei

 

I recommend you use EVID=4 at time=0 in the 2nd period on the dataset. Also
you consider the relative BA(F1 parameter).

 

ID   TIME  AMT  DV  EVID  DRUG

1       0   100    .     1       1

1       0.3  .     0.7    0       1 

1       0.5  .     2      0       1

....

1       48   .     0.6    0     1

1        0    100  .     4      2

1        0.3  .    0.3     0     2

1        0.5 .     1.6     0     2

 

$PK

KA=THETA(1)*EXP(ETA(1))

CL=THETA(2)*EXP(ETA(2))

V=THETA(3)*EXP(ETA(3))

F1=1

 

IF (DRUG.EQ.2) THEN

KA=THETA(4)*EXP(ETA(4))

CL=THETA(5)*EXP(ETA(5))

V=THETA(6)*EXP(ETA(6))

F1=THETA(7) *EXP(ETA(7)); Relative BA parameter

ENDIF

 

Thanks!

Yoshi

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of wangxipei
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 2:51 PM
To: nmusers
Subject: [NMusers] NONMEM codes about PK analysis from a cross-over study
design

 

Dear NONMEM users,

    I  have a data set from a bioavailablity study (2×2 study design). 18
people took a single dose of a marketed drug (marked as R), then after a
wash-out period, took a single dose the corresponding generic drug (marked
T). I want to estimate the PK parameters of T and R seperately. One
approach we handle the dataset is to consider the 18 people as 36 people.
Is it right?

I still want to handle them as 18 people. I read something useful in the
NONMEM guides on EVID, but still comfused about the data file structure and
the NONMEM codes. 

 

Thank you very much ahead for any comments.

 

Xipei Wang

Beijing, China

 

Part of my codes and data are as below:

data set:

ID   TIME AMT  DV  EVID  DRUG

1       0     100    .       1        1

1       0.3  .         0.7   0        1 

1       0.5  .         2      0        1
....

1       48   .        0.6    0        1

1        0    .        .         3        .

1        0    100   .         1       2

1        0.3  .       0.3     0       2

1        0.5 .        1.6     0       2
....
 

 

NONMEM CODES:

 

$INPUT ID  TIME AMT  DV  EVID  DRUG

$DATA sample.csv
$SUBROUTINES ADVAN2 TRANS2

$PK
 KA=THETA(1)*EXP(ETA(1))
 CL=THETA(2)*EXP(ETA(2))
 V=THETA(3)*EXP(ETA(3))

 

IF (DRUG.EQ.2) THEN

 KA=THETA(4)*EXP(ETA(4))
 CL=THETA(5)*EXP(ETA(5))
 V=THETA(6)*EXP(ETA(6))

ENDIF
 S2=V/1000

 

$ERROR
Y=F+ERR(1)

$THETA 
(0, 2)      ;KA
(0, 8)      ;CL
(0, 4)      ;V

(0, 2)      ;
(0, 8)      ;
(0, 4)      ;

$OMEGA 
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04

$SIGMA 
0.04

$ESTIMATION MAXEVAL=9999 METHOD=1 

 

 

Reply via email to