Dear Claire,

You may want to look at Zhou's paper, it has a summary of the different type of 
absorption models.

Best regards,

Jean

Reference:

Pharmacokinetic Strategies in Deciphering Atypical Drug Absorption Profiles. 
Honghui Zhou, J Clin Pharmacol 2003;43:211-227



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Xu, Claire
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 12:05 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NMusers] Question about modeling variable absorption kinetics

Hi NMusers,

I am trying to develop a population model of a drug that was given at a single 
dose using the PK data from two studies with different dosage. In one study 
with the higher dose (n=26, four-way cross-over), it seems to have three 
different patterns of kinetics: 1. the first measured concentration is Cmax 
(fast absorption); 2. a secondary peak; 3. more common oral PK with 1st-order 
Ka(normal absorption). In the other study with lower dose (n=46, two-way 
cross-over), the overall kinetics are less variable within the study. But there 
are about 30% subjects have about 50% higher  Cmax than others.

I tried one-compartment, two-compartment and ALAG models to fit the PK from the 
first study with higher dose and also played with the introduction of BOV and 
BSV on Ka and/or TLAG. All the models generally cannot capture the absorption 
very well with an underprediction of Cmax. And None of the complex models 
really gave improved fitting compared to simple one-compartment model. I also 
tested transit model and it didn't improve the fitting either.

Then, I focused on the PK with fast and normal absorption only and exclude the 
PK with the secondary peak. I found that two-compartment model can give good 
fitting for PK with fast absorption and normal absorption,respectively. The 
estimated Ka for fast and normal absorption PK are three times different, and 
then I tried mixture model on Ka to fit the two PK dataset together. But it 
suffered boundary failure and the percentage of the subpopulations can not be 
estimated.

For the second study with lower dose, I have similar problem. The majority of 
Cmax is underpredicted, but I have good fitting of elimination phase in both 
case.

It seems that I exhausted the possibilities that I can think of. Can anyone 
give some comments or suggestions ?

Thanks a lot!

Best,
--
Xu, Claire
Ph.D Candidate
Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Wishard Hospital
Indiana University School of Medicine
1001 West 10th Street, Myers W7122
Indianapolis, IN  46202
T - 317/7558242<tel:317%2F7558242>


This electronic transmission may contain confidential and/or proprietary 
information and is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named 
above.  If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this electronic transmission is 
prohibited.  If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please 
destroy it and immediately notify us of the error. Thank you.

Reply via email to