Hi Abdullah:

This depends on how you set your criteria for including covariates into the 
model (the p-value, reduction in OFV, se of the estimated covariate parameter 
etc).
Before starting running covariate models, it is always a good practice to plot 
BSV (i.e. ETAs) against the available covariates your have (in your case: ETAs 
versus weight) then if you see biologically plausible covariate relationships 
then you start testing them.  I usually use forward addition (p-value 0.05, 
delta reduction 3.84 or p-value 0.01, delta OFV 6.63 units) and backward 
elimination (p-value 0.001, delta increase OFV 10.8 units) and se should be < 
51.2%. You don't need to stick with these criteria but you can develop your 
own. If including a covariate passes all the criteria and is estimated 
precisely, then I think it should stay in the model. Reduction in BSV > 5% may 
be significant.

There are various methods for including covariates in the literature, you may 
need to choose yours!

Sincerely,
Ahmad Abuhelwa
University of South Australia
Adelaide, South Australia
Australia





From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Sultan,Abdullah S
Sent: Wednesday, 9 December 2015 11:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NMusers] Weight based dosing


Hi everyone,



I am developing a POP PK model for an anti-infective drug, I am trying to 
determine if dosing should be weight based or not. The range of weight in the 
study was 40-100 kg.



Weight was statistically significant for Cl/F but only explained 9% of the 
variability observed for Cl.



I used allometric scaling to describe weights effect on Cl/F and slope effect 
of weight was 0.58, and scaled to 60 kg (the median).



Based on the slope effect estimated, AUC is predicted to decrease by 15% for an 
80 kg individual, and increase by 25% for an individual that weights 40 kg 
compared to a 60 kg individual.



How much should I trust the slope effect determined by my study? and should I 
rely on it to develop the dosing regimen?

if weight only explained 9% of variability observed with Cl/F, could that 
indicate that it is not clinically significant and weight based dosing is not 
required?







Thanks,

Abdullah Sultan, PhD candidate

University of Florida

Reply via email to