Hi, I read the recent NOI response and it sparked my interest in the relationship between Net Neutrality and bufferbloat. I also found [1] which makes it seem Net Neutrality is an obstacle to solving bufferbloat in the US, at least. I'm just curious about the legal obstacles to bufferbloat solutions in the US. I tried reading the FCC rules which I understand changed in 2010, 2014, and 2017 but theye're kinda vague I think and I am no lawyer nor industry veteran and don't think I really understand the implications.
In particular, [1] claims: > Misapplied concepts of network neutrality is one of the things that killed > fq codel for DOCSIS 3.1 Does anyone know more about this? When looking around, I found more similar claims [2]: > Finally, some jurisdictions impose regulations that limit the ability of > networks to provide differentiation of services, in large part this seems to > be based on the belief that doing so necessarily involves prioritization or > privileged access to bandwidth, and thus a benefit to one class of traffic > always comes at the expense of another. Anyone know what regulations the authors mean here? I personally run openwrt+sqm/cake in my home router and have found it to be effective, so I am convinced of the value of sqm. Is Net Neutrality regulation an obstacle to wider deployment? [1] https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/net_neutrality_customers/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb/ Thanks, Ronan _______________________________________________ Nnagain mailing list Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
