Kevin McArthur wrote:
Verizon does continue to set itself apart.
The statement:
"Pasko stressed, however, that Verizon wants to work with P2P
companies that are focusing on delivery of legitimate media, like
Pando -- not systems where anyone can upload anything, which usually
means lots of pirated material."
does strike me as having the potential to run into neutrality concerns
when the carriers begin picking winners and losers in the P2P
technology competition. As we all know, Bittorrent is open-source (and
as a company, focused on legitimate media) while other solutions are
either closed source or subject to content controls, patents and other
nonsense. I'd hate to see the carriers giving competitive advantage to
one but not the other just based upon their ownership of the gateway.
Verizon DSL and FIOS service already has one dark stain when it comes to
neutrality. They have a feature called "DNS Assistant" which is
designed to redirect web browsers to a Verizon/Yahoo search page in the
event they type in a URL for which the hostname does not resolve.
Verizon's DNS servers will reply with the IP addresses of their own
search engine rather than returning a correct negative response. Up
until a few months ago it was possible to opt out of the DNS Assistant
service; however, the opt out capability has been removed. After
talking to a number of sales, internal support, technical support, and
engineering personnel at Verizon, it became apparent that the marketing
department at Verizon initiated the policy change that led to the
removal of the DNS Assistant opt out capability.
The DNS Assistant service causes problems for VPN software, among other
things.
The message in both the Pando P2P announcment and the "DNS Assistant"
change is that marketing trumps everything else.
Kelly
