Why cops won't need a warrant to pull the data off your autonomous car

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/02/why-self-driving-cars-may-be-heaven-for-investigating-crimes-and-accidents/

        In order for AVs to work, they have to snag all kinds of data
        about the world around them: where precisely other objects are
        at any given moment and how fast they are moving.  That data
        can seemingly be kept forever.  Under current law, all of that
        data can be obtained relatively easily by federal law
        enforcement. In other words, if you're a privacy-minded
        citizen, your threat model just changed.  "Because of all of
        the sensors and data that is being captured--[AVs] are giant
        recording things," Jaeger said. "Even if they're not involved
        in an incident directly, they captured some of it. Maybe
        infrared data or something."  This is profoundly different
        from older cars that lack such sensors and do not gather up
        such vast quantities of stored data. As such, Tesla's terms
        and conditions--like those of other non-automotive tech
        companies, including Apple, Google, and more--say that the
        company will hand over data to law enforcement when legally
        compelled to do so. Waymo did not respond to Ars' multiple
        queries for clarification its position, so how far that
        assistance will go is anyone's guess.  For now, federal law
        and Supreme Court precedent dictates that law enforcement has
        the authority to legally monitor anyone in public. The basic
        idea is that none of us have a "reasonable expectation of
        privacy" when we are in public. So just as the police can
        capture us with video cameras and license plate readers, so,
        too, could they contract with AV automakers to simply get at
        vast quantities of future AV data. And if the companies don't
        want to play ball, such data can be accessed with a mere court
        order (known as a "d-order") under the Stored Communications
        Act of 1986.

 - - -

Like I've been saying for ages. Even beyond the remote control
capabilities that law enforcement and governments will demand, the
video and other data collected by robocars are already making law
enforcement salivate. It's not just Waymo that doesn't like talking
about these aspects of robocars. Nobody in the industry wants
the public thinking about these aspects.

--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein ([email protected]): https://www.vortex.com/lauren 
Lauren's Blog: https://lauren.vortex.com
Google Issues Mailing List: https://vortex.com/google-issues
Founder: Network Neutrality Squad: https://www.nnsquad.org 
         PRIVACY Forum: https://www.vortex.com/privacy-info
Co-Founder: People For Internet Responsibility: https://www.pfir.org/pfir-info
Member: ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
Google+: https://google.com/+LaurenWeinstein
Twitter: https://twitter.com/laurenweinstein
Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800
_______________________________________________
nnsquad mailing list
https://lists.nnsquad.org/mailman/listinfo/nnsquad

Reply via email to