On Dec 17, 2008, at 9:35 AM, Patrick Burleson wrote: > Something I enjoyed in other financial tracking applications was their > auto-incrementing of the check numbers when entering a check. > Actually, it was really max(check_number) + 1. Right now MW memorizes > the check number?! If no auto-increment, then how about taking check > number off the auto-memorization list?
Patrick, This is on the request list. I never liked it much in Quicken because both Judy and I would write checks and the sequence was never clean. I guess this works if only one person controls the checkbook and only one sequence of numbers is active at a time. With regards to check features, it's funny to be dealing with the exact opposite in the U.K.. They don't have checking accounts and instead call them "current" accounts. Checks are considered very old fashioned and rarely used or seen, yet so many U.S. customers write lots of checks still and some even want MoneyWell to print checks. Personally, I've worked very hard to eliminate check writing in my life so I guess I lean towards the British in this respect. Peace, Kevin Hoctor [email protected] No Thirst Software LLC http://nothirst.com http://kevinhoctor.blogspot.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "No Thirst Software User Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/no-thirst-software?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
