Sounds good. Thanks Kevin.
On Jan 29, 9:10 am, Kevin Hoctor <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2009, at 8:05 AM, mikemc wrote:
>
>
>
> > I have transactions from 12/26/2008 to 01/27/2009 in my checking
> > account, that I entered manually. All the December transactions have
> > a status of reconciled (being as my cash flow start date is
> > 1/1/2009). When I went to Import my bank statement for the dates
> > indicated...after merging the duplicate transactions, it change all
> > the transactions' statuses to "Cleared"...even the ones already marked
> > as reconciled.
>
> > I can understand wanting to allow the user to know this transaction
> > was imported electronically as well as reconciled, but
>
> > 1) it was really entered manually and the online transaction was just
> > a duplicate
> > 2) even if it was imported electronically, if a transaction is flagged
> > "Reconcile" why would one want to change to "Cleared"? I understand
> > wanting to flag both, but shouldn't "Reconcile" supersede all other
> > statuses when it comes to being displayed in the Transaction List?
>
> > Sorry so long winded...and hope it makes sense.
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> This shouldn't have happened. I'll try to make sure it gets fixed in
> 1.4.3. Thanks.
>
> Peace,
>
> Kevin Hoctor
> [email protected]
> No Thirst Software LLChttp://nothirst.comhttp://kevinhoctor.blogspot.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "No
Thirst Software User Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/no-thirst-software?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
