Samori, you should definitely update your example module to use node-gyp
instead of node-waf! We want new module authors to use the new stuff;
forward compatibility and all that.

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Samori Gorse <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 on the general idea.
>
> I've been waiting for the node-waf -> node_gyp switch for a while now.
> I'm working on a project to help node.js module authors get started with
> the whole C++ thing:
>
>  https://github.com/shinuza/node-cc-module-boilerplate
>
> The biggest problem with node-waf is that the version bundled with node is
> super outdated and the documentation is hard to find. Same thing goes with
> the automated doc for the V8 API.
>
> > 2. We'll build some cloudy buildbot CI stuff to compile all the things.
>
> I thought of this while reading the original post, although it might
> require some special setup to register a particular module for compiling.
>
> --
> Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
> Posting guidelines:
> https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "nodejs" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
>

Reply via email to