On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Marco Rogers <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm assuming this affects 0.4.x as well.
No, this only applies to v0.6. v0.4 probably has its own share of defects but this one is not part of that. :-)
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Marco Rogers <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm assuming this affects 0.4.x as well.
No, this only applies to v0.6. v0.4 probably has its own share of defects but this one is not part of that. :-)